| Shazta | |
| Beatriz Cazeneuve |
|
| |
Reply with quote | #2 |
I don't have one and I have no idea what kind of detergent is in them but I only use Lavender and Orange oil to wash the birdroom floor, it cleans and smells wonderful. |
| Loading... | | |
| jack | |
| Steph |
|
| |
Reply with quote | #4 |
I don't know about the chemicals in the swiffer floor mop, but I do know there was a false story about how one killed someone's dog. It wasn't true, you can go to http://www.snopes.com and put in Swiffer for more information on that. Also, there is a floor cleaning tool similar to the swiffer but the pad used was machine washable, you could wet it and use it wet or use it dry. This way you can use your own cleaning products, like natural ones that won't harm your pets! I hope this helps. Steph
Little Furries Rescue and Referral |
| Loading... | | |
| Janis |
|
| |
Reply with quote | #5 |
You can also just use just a damp microfiber pad on a wand for mopping. You can also contact Procter & Gamble through their website & ask what chemicals are in the swiffer wet pads (pg.com). If you find out, be sure to let us know. |
| Loading... | | |
| shazta |
|
| |
Reply with quote | #6 |
after reading this I will never support this company!!! Taken from a website.................. Each year, thousands of animals die in Procter & Gamble laboratories -- the victims of painful, archaic and entirely unnecessary product tests. Caustic chemicals are forced into the eyes of rabbits and applied to animals' shaved and raw skin. Laboratory workers place the animals in restraining devices so they cannot struggle while the workers apply the chemicals, which burn into the animals' eyes and skin. P&G "scientists" do not sedate the animals or give them pain killers. Animals sometimes break their necks or backs attempting to escape the pain. Those that survive are used in yet additional painful tests ... until they are finally killed. The victims include rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, ferrets and other animals. P&G refuses to stop testing its products on animals, despite the fact that these tests are not required by any law, and despite the fact that more reliable and humane alternatives do exist. Procter & Gamble spends millions of dollars to package itself as a responsible, caring company, and claims to be a leader in the development of alternatives to the use of animals in product testing. But P&G refuses to put its money where its mouth is. In 1996 alone, P&G spent $5.1 billion on advertising. This stands in stark contrast to the $64 million that P&G claims to have spent on developing alternatives over a 14-year period! Despite its repeated P.R. claims about being in the forefront of developing alternatives and reducing product testing on animals, P&G's priorities seem clear: in less than 5 days, P&G spends more on advertising than it claims to have spent in 14 years on alternatives to painful and lethal animal tests. The fact is, P&G says one thing and does another. If they truly shared our goal of eliminating animal cruelty, P&G would not have lobbied to defeat a bill before the California legislature that would have banned the infamous Draize eye-irritancy test. In reality, P&G relies on these archaic tests strictly for its own protection from liability lawsuits. The truth is that P&G could stop animal testing today without hindering anyone's safety. Until it stops its animal cruelty, the letters P&G will stand for nothing but Pain & Greed! |
| Loading... | | |
| Shazta | |
| milood |
|
| |
Reply with quote | #8 |
this is the information posted at P&Gs web site | | | Research involving animals at P&G |  | | | Question | | | What is your policy about research involving animals at P&G? |  | | | Answer | | | P&G has ended research involving animals on all our finished consumer products except when required by law. We use non-animal alternatives first. We'll only use animal testing when there are no other reasonable options.
In our Healthcare business, we're focused on developing innovative medicines that improve people's lives. Current regulatory standards require animal research while developing these medications. It's our policy to use the minimum number of animals necessary while working toward our goal of the reduction and replacement of animals. We continue to identify screening techniques that are acceptable to global regulatory groups to take the place of animal tests in the earliest phase of drug discovery.
Through our pet care and nutrition products, we help dogs and cats live longer, healthier lives. We feed our foods first to dogs and cats to help us develop nutrition that delivers true health benefits to millions of pets worldwide. We make sure the dogs and cats we work with receive the best care. We treat them as if they're our own pets. They are adopted into loving homes or placed in our retirement facility when their help is no longer needed. At the same time, we're working hard on alternatives to find even better ways of getting these results and eliminating the need for additional research with other animals.
We'd rather use alternative test methods. Not only is the use of animals avoided, but reliable alternative tests generally cost less and take less time than animal research. We'd like to be able to eliminate animal research on ingredients in consumer products altogether, and we're making progress. We've invested over $190 million in alternatives, making us an industry leader. We've helped develop over 50 alternative methods and have shared our work in over 300 scientific publications. We're also working with the FDA and respected animal welfare groups, such as the Humane Society of the United States, to work on reforming regulations and validating alternative methods. To learn more, check out our website at http://www.pg.com/science/animal_alt.jhtml | | |
| Loading... | | |
| Lost me |
|
| |
Reply with quote | #9 |
Milood You have lost me? Are you pro or con. I think this is terrible... |
| Loading... | | |
| Anon |
|
| |
Reply with quote | #10 | I hate to break it to all the animal rights activists and vegans out there, but there is NOTHING on the market that has not in some indirect way been tested on animals. When a company says the do not use animal testing (for example The Body Shop) it only means that THEY do not test on animals. But the products that go into their final product have all, at some point, been tested on animals. Patroleum, aloe, oils, scents... at some point have been tested. As an animal lover, this is heartbreaking to me, but to choose one company over another based on animal testing is pointless. You cannot live in this world without contributing some way to the experimnting or abuse of animals. That Advil you took for your headache- the antibiotics that saved your childs life... all EXTENSIVELY tested on animals. The cotton you wear (in lieu of leather) was sheared from sheep who were kept in inhumane conditions, the soap you use, the fabric in your furniture... it's naive to think we can escape what has been done, and is being done. I believe that the better sollution, if you want to make a change, is to improve the way these animals are treated... volunteer in a research facility. Lobby to make their lives better... because it will never stop. It can't. |
| Loading... | | |
| Stay at home mom | |